accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Berman <mber...@sqrrl.com>
Subject Re: Integration Tests
Date Fri, 13 Sep 2013 22:10:26 GMT
Do you mean downstream?  That seems reasonable to me.

But it's hard to tell if they're building consistently when they're not
being continuously built :-)


On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Billie Rinaldi <billie.rinaldi@gmail.com>wrote:

> I was considering making separate builds for the ITs upstream from the
> non-IT builds. Or we could just turn ITs back on, if they're building
> consistently.
>
> Billie
> On Sep 13, 2013 5:16 PM, "Michael Berman" <mberman@sqrrl.com> wrote:
>
> > I have a new theory about why Jenkins is passing even though it looks to
> me
> > like integration tests couldn't possibly pass: It seems like Jenkins is
> not
> > running integration tests.
> >
> > Vines just took a look at the job config (which I can't see because I
> don't
> > have a jenkins account), and discovered that skipITs is set.  Is that
> > deliberate?  Can we get them turned back on?  Even if they're excluded
> from
> > some jobs for speed, it seems like they should be turned on *somewhere*.
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message