Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mridley@cloudera.com designates
 209.85.128.52 as permitted sender)
Subject: Re: SVN or GIT
References: <1623379189.8323063.1377129937636.JavaMail.root@comcast.net>
 <521556C0.5010408@gmail.com>
 <891949476.8327633.1377130483026.JavaMail.root@comcast.net>
 <CAL5zq9Yq=XM0Z=roZ9+FVWwoWwLs=6dr-zpR94wm2cQga-ssfg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Michael Ridley <mridley@cloudera.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAL5zq9Yq=XM0Z=roZ9+FVWwoWwLs=6dr-zpR94wm2cQga-ssfg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-Id: <E34FAFE8-9CCC-41FD-A224-46826DABD29D@cloudera.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 22:51:29 -0400
To: "dev@accumulo.apache.org" <dev@accumulo.apache.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)

This sounds like a good approach to me.

(Long time listener, first time caller - my understanding is that I can't vo=
te but I can comment..,yes...?)

Michael Ridley
Sent from my mobile.
Pardon any spelling errors.

On Aug 26, 2013, at 2:41 PM, Christopher <ctubbsii@apache.org> wrote:

> Since we're on git now... to avoid confusion like this in the future
> (not just from PMC/committers who may not have touched the code in
> awhile, but also from users looking for the source)...
>=20
> I think it would be useful to do what Thrift did, and replace the
> existing source branches in SVN with a README
> (https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/thrift/README?view=3Dlog). The SVN
> history will still be there, and people will still be able to
> reference tags, just like with thrift
> (https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/thrift/tags/thrift-0.8.0/?pathrev=3D1419982=
).
>=20
> I'm personally in favor of removing all of
> {trunk,branches,contrib,tags} with a README, but if people insist on
> {tags} remaining behind, I'd settle for replacing only the other
> three. (Technically, the tags are still there... at the version they
> were created... which is the only reliable way of referencing a tag in
> SVN anyway... so that's why I don't mind removing them in SVN HEAD).
>=20
> To make things easier on passers-by, we can document in the README,
> the last commit that occurred in SVN, and provide a viewvc link
> directly to that, and can also provide the svn command to check out
> that revision.
>=20
> Removing these paths from the SVN will help resolve any confusion
> about where our current development activity is taking place.
>=20
> --
> Christopher L Tubbs II
> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>=20
>=20
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 8:14 PM,  <dlmarion@comcast.net> wrote:
>> Thanks Josh.
>>=20
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>=20
>> From: "Josh Elser" <josh.elser@gmail.com>
>> To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 8:09:36 PM
>> Subject: Re: SVN or GIT
>>=20
>> No, SVN is not an option for main Accumulo development.
>>=20
>> The CMS site is still hosted on SVN, that's why the SVN info is still
>> there at all. It could possibly be trimmed some more -- I forget where I
>> left it.
>>=20
>> On 08/21/2013 08:05 PM, dlmarion@comcast.net wrote:
>>> Have not committed anything in a while. I read the GIT WIP wiki page. Is=
 svn still an option at this point, or do I need to move over to git. What's=
 the latest?
>>=20
>>=20