Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: vines@apache.org
In-Reply-To: <E34FAFE8-9CCC-41FD-A224-46826DABD29D@cloudera.com>
References: <1623379189.8323063.1377129937636.JavaMail.root@comcast.net>
 <521556C0.5010408@gmail.com>
 <891949476.8327633.1377130483026.JavaMail.root@comcast.net>
 <CAL5zq9Yq=XM0Z=roZ9+FVWwoWwLs=6dr-zpR94wm2cQga-ssfg@mail.gmail.com>
 <E34FAFE8-9CCC-41FD-A224-46826DABD29D@cloudera.com>
From: John Vines <vines@apache.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 23:00:46 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <CADczPYSEASDGV7xb5pErx58BZBLTTPFVVj7mwzO0XbLVWr2=WA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: SVN or GIT
To: Accumulo Dev List <dev@accumulo.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c233ea6629e104e50d52ba

--001a11c233ea6629e104e50d52ba
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

That's right, Michael.


Also, agree


On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 10:51 PM, Michael Ridley <mridley@cloudera.com>wrote:

> This sounds like a good approach to me.
>
> (Long time listener, first time caller - my understanding is that I can't
> vote but I can comment..,yes...?)
>
> Michael Ridley
> Sent from my mobile.
> Pardon any spelling errors.
>
> On Aug 26, 2013, at 2:41 PM, Christopher <ctubbsii@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Since we're on git now... to avoid confusion like this in the future
> > (not just from PMC/committers who may not have touched the code in
> > awhile, but also from users looking for the source)...
> >
> > I think it would be useful to do what Thrift did, and replace the
> > existing source branches in SVN with a README
> > (https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/thrift/README?view=log). The SVN
> > history will still be there, and people will still be able to
> > reference tags, just like with thrift
> > (https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/thrift/tags/thrift-0.8.0/?pathrev=1419982
> ).
> >
> > I'm personally in favor of removing all of
> > {trunk,branches,contrib,tags} with a README, but if people insist on
> > {tags} remaining behind, I'd settle for replacing only the other
> > three. (Technically, the tags are still there... at the version they
> > were created... which is the only reliable way of referencing a tag in
> > SVN anyway... so that's why I don't mind removing them in SVN HEAD).
> >
> > To make things easier on passers-by, we can document in the README,
> > the last commit that occurred in SVN, and provide a viewvc link
> > directly to that, and can also provide the svn command to check out
> > that revision.
> >
> > Removing these paths from the SVN will help resolve any confusion
> > about where our current development activity is taking place.
> >
> > --
> > Christopher L Tubbs II
> > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 8:14 PM,  <dlmarion@comcast.net> wrote:
> >> Thanks Josh.
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >>
> >> From: "Josh Elser" <josh.elser@gmail.com>
> >> To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
> >> Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 8:09:36 PM
> >> Subject: Re: SVN or GIT
> >>
> >> No, SVN is not an option for main Accumulo development.
> >>
> >> The CMS site is still hosted on SVN, that's why the SVN info is still
> >> there at all. It could possibly be trimmed some more -- I forget where I
> >> left it.
> >>
> >> On 08/21/2013 08:05 PM, dlmarion@comcast.net wrote:
> >>> Have not committed anything in a while. I read the GIT WIP wiki page.
> Is svn still an option at this point, or do I need to move over to git.
> What's the latest?
> >>
> >>
>

--001a11c233ea6629e104e50d52ba--