accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mike Drob <md...@mdrob.com>
Subject Re: SVN or GIT
Date Mon, 26 Aug 2013 20:16:48 GMT
+1


On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Keith Turner <keith@deenlo.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Christopher <ctubbsii@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Since we're on git now... to avoid confusion like this in the future
> > (not just from PMC/committers who may not have touched the code in
> > awhile, but also from users looking for the source)...
> >
> > I think it would be useful to do what Thrift did, and replace the
> > existing source branches in SVN with a README
> > (https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/thrift/README?view=log). The SVN
> > history will still be there, and people will still be able to
> > reference tags, just like with thrift
> > (https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/thrift/tags/thrift-0.8.0/?pathrev=1419982
> ).
>
>
> +1
>
>
> > I'm personally in favor of removing all of
> > {trunk,branches,contrib,tags} with a README, but if people insist on
> > {tags} remaining behind, I'd settle for replacing only the other
> > three. (Technically, the tags are still there... at the version they
> > were created... which is the only reliable way of referencing a tag in
> > SVN anyway... so that's why I don't mind removing them in SVN HEAD).
> >
> > To make things easier on passers-by, we can document in the README,
> > the last commit that occurred in SVN, and provide a viewvc link
> > directly to that, and can also provide the svn command to check out
> > that revision.
> >
> > Removing these paths from the SVN will help resolve any confusion
> > about where our current development activity is taking place.
> >
> > --
> > Christopher L Tubbs II
> > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 8:14 PM,  <dlmarion@comcast.net> wrote:
> > > Thanks Josh.
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > >
> > > From: "Josh Elser" <josh.elser@gmail.com>
> > > To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 8:09:36 PM
> > > Subject: Re: SVN or GIT
> > >
> > > No, SVN is not an option for main Accumulo development.
> > >
> > > The CMS site is still hosted on SVN, that's why the SVN info is still
> > > there at all. It could possibly be trimmed some more -- I forget where
> I
> > > left it.
> > >
> > > On 08/21/2013 08:05 PM, dlmarion@comcast.net wrote:
> > >> Have not committed anything in a while. I read the GIT WIP wiki page.
> > Is svn still an option at this point, or do I need to move over to git.
> > What's the latest?
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message