Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of joey@cloudera.com designates
 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 11:02:51 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <CAEGKEUNu6i+Hdx1DN-yfSzfgif4ureuCVZ1EovW1oCucGU1RNg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Hadoop 2.0 Support for Accumulo 1.4 Branch
From: Joey Echeverria <joey@cloudera.com>
To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b605020c1460704e26b6f1f

--047d7b605020c1460704e26b6f1f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Cloudera announced last night our support for Accumulo 1.4.3 on CDH4:

http://www.slideshare.net/JoeyEcheverria/apache-accumulo-and-cloudera

This required back porting about 11 patches in whole or in part from the
1.5 line on top of 1.4.3. Our release is still in a semi-private beta, but
when it's fully public it will be downloadable along with all of the extra
patches that we committed.

My question is if the community would be interested in us pulling those
back ports upstream?

I believe this would violate the previously agreed upon rule of no feature
back ports to 1.4.3, depending on how we "label" support for Hadoop 2.0.

Thoughts?

-Joey

--047d7b605020c1460704e26b6f1f--