accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ed Kohlwey <>
Subject Re: Generic Supertypes/Pluggable Client
Date Fri, 05 Jul 2013 17:27:42 GMT
> It would be very nice if the types you mentioned were more consistent
> across the API.  Personally I would like to see byte[] and ByteSequence
> fully supported across all of the APIs related to reading and writing data.
>   We added support for byte[] to mutation in 1.5. Thinking back, we should
> have added support for ByteSequence too.

+1. If we make everything tie back to ByteSequence and make the
serialization/deserialization logic pluggable, then everyone will be happy.
Do you have any ideas based on the sketch I included that would help make
this better for all types, not just byte[]?

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message