Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8883B100BB for ; Wed, 5 Jun 2013 02:26:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 64386 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2013 02:26:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 64358 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2013 02:26:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 64350 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jun 2013 02:26:39 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Jun 2013 02:26:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bimargulies@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.45 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.45] (HELO mail-bk0-f45.google.com) (209.85.214.45) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Jun 2013 02:26:34 +0000 Received: by mail-bk0-f45.google.com with SMTP id je10so536202bkc.4 for ; Tue, 04 Jun 2013 19:26:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=LVUlwfVDxRxpl6+Na0aZE2GlOVZ6Qw3SCtFkOCCfXHs=; b=PVN844egzGZ4Bl2z2N6KJe7aerRPPJWhCQIp/pmVTR7qYxr/J8LMXFkx7nW5bbommq srL0cXat+l7Uv4Or7Dljx6/z+Dx41i4XeyxK0IG4wj3rXO0QSU+/xj02OsZYEFoiK65+ 39d0sjClfmXcLhs12AGWNpu1oXUzXbBoUgy6Ogg/xcY+7C6zecUu5TPbK8ruaED1k5C1 yUHINYfVUccjSh+6DJ9M4qeLiFSMyf+8r7TdCxPYB8QPCmofVFXy7W1Ck5q0GrV7xlyM 7cP8kwKcX5A6iZ1lkWP2ddJHEHVnS1RH86KypimzA4WbvTPgclLXDWmn9tyVGrYuIPy8 BP1g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.204.71.77 with SMTP id g13mr8781833bkj.50.1370399173064; Tue, 04 Jun 2013 19:26:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.17.134 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Jun 2013 19:26:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <51AE9F9B.5040201@gmail.com> References: <51ADE68B.7090909@gmail.com> <51AE9F9B.5040201@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 22:26:12 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: GIT From: Benson Margulies To: "dev@accumulo.apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > 1.4.4 has been released. The first person finds some changes that should be > placed into a 1.4.5 release. As such, a 1.4.5-SNAPSHOT branch would be > created from the 1.4.4 tag. What's the advantage of 1.4.5-SNAPSHOT as opposed to a branch named 1.4.x? On other projects, there's an assumption of one branch per maintained minor version, with point releases as tags along they way. How is your more complex? scheme advantageous?