Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8B1E3101E1 for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2013 19:08:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 14776 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2013 19:08:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 14717 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2013 19:08:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 14709 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jun 2013 19:08:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Jun 2013 19:08:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of eric.newton@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.49 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.49] (HELO mail-wg0-f49.google.com) (74.125.82.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Jun 2013 19:08:34 +0000 Received: by mail-wg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id y10so557216wgg.28 for ; Tue, 04 Jun 2013 12:08:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=Loh5wH7s3aUd3gR9yr9taTRnTCgWFHCVUcRtbnA470g=; b=fYAU+jNaRGDSf3SXkNZZ0gfxmXFMiC/yjET3Pm9bdCJBVHf5JWQObQAKQoTmK/NKpz PWvUAO18+8LIG8shvmKwe+NbUx396WFd1T7NXrqYgTvLjIi1gvWMNI/7vImUD/6NDfFH JOVGQTn5carT6vdemVSqxOI7xD67InxgGZQ/P2YxtwjsAQKHWr/21nmnHHUmfiaXNKCY DUe40UBRAWCKhf5VoElYeg4KyuirUox2bh/M9YmS3Unpc7AKrvc/2ANtQDhXjqUqFJ29 0Jl0iXPAadjkcnCqBcD2RRTkvC1NorDPlDtQaJ7jliIB2XsBUnd/J5WMwH2EVshEas/4 1jDg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.107.104 with SMTP id hb8mr3010548wib.26.1370372892147; Tue, 04 Jun 2013 12:08:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.51.8 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Jun 2013 12:08:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <51AE35A8.1020205@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 15:08:12 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] The State of Old Versions From: Eric Newton To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f234ce5724d0f04de58cdae X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --e89a8f234ce5724d0f04de58cdae Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +1 to dropping the branch If someone else wants to volunteer to make the release, I'll change my mind. :-) -Eric On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Christopher wrote: > It has been suggested that going through the effort of releasing 1.3.7 > is not worth it. So, I'm leaning towards dropping the fixVersion of > 1.3.7 on the two tickets, and simply dropping the branch, myself. > > -- > Christopher L Tubbs II > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii > > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > > +1 > > > > > > On 5/31/13 6:33 PM, Mike Drob wrote: > >> > >> 1.3 - I agree with releasing a source only tag of 1.3.7 and calling it > >> end-of-life. The changes are there, throwing them away seems silly (and > >> rude?). That said, I'm not volunteering to be the one to put it > together, > >> so I feel a bit guilty suggesting that somebody else do it. > --e89a8f234ce5724d0f04de58cdae--