accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org>
Subject Re: GIT
Date Wed, 05 Jun 2013 16:59:22 GMT
I don't think we should restrict the development branches to be local.
They can be pushed, but they should still be removed from the remote
after merging to master, just to keep things pretty and organized.

--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii


On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 12:49 PM, David Medinets
<david.medinets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>+1 for only having one infinite-lifetime branch.
>
> Do we all have the same understanding that branches and tags (and SHA-1
> hashes) are essentially the same thing in git? Is the Accumulo community
> saying that a release gets a git tag but development is done inside a
> branch? Each developer creates a personal branch, does stuff and then
> merges that branch (details TBD) into master. The development branch is
> always local and not pushed to the official git repository? I'll note that
> this description does not preclude developers from sharing each other's
> branches in a point-to-point network.

Mime
View raw message