Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAL5zq9bVvx=JAnEsByVzpw6sKdEGnxy6Fm439MEt0oF+=z+01g@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CADxc9Bm6pWatvfDDMhFznTpO7SMr1+ApL1bApid-LtNySbJVUA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGUtCHq1YiMtmtsurzSdsCPiKhi=ncAF7WFDKRh8=PnpVN42MA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPMpPc42-YWTduc4AqZbmDV4yxX-wocGUzpRg5-djVaYjCQ+RA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAL5zq9bVvx=JAnEsByVzpw6sKdEGnxy6Fm439MEt0oF+=z+01g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 14:03:46 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <CAPMpPc7X-__vvSTmH6+RNOY+ow-YLo6ubix=AW5ZD5aB+bwPMg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: hadoop-2.0 incompatibility
From: Adam Fuchs <afuchs@apache.org>
To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c37f5a3d493c04dd3e45fd

--001a11c37f5a3d493c04dd3e45fd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Yes, that's correct. It looks like we only need to exercise the two builds
option if we find a need later on.

Adam


On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Christopher <ctubbsii@apache.org> wrote:

> Sure, that's still an option, but I don't think this particular
> incompatibility makes it necessary, does it?
>
> --
> Christopher L Tubbs II
> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>
>
> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Adam Fuchs <afuchs@apache.org> wrote:
> > We still have the option of putting out a separate build for 1.5.0
> > compatibility with hadoop 2. Should we vote on that release separately?
> > Seems like it should be easy to add more binary packages that correspond
> to
> > the same source release, even after the initial vote.
> >
> > Adam
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Keith Turner <keith@deenlo.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Eric Newton <eric.newton@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Ugh.  While running the continuous ingest verify, yarn spit this out:
> >> >
> >> > Error: Found interface org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.Counter, but class
> was
> >> > expected
> >> >
> >> > This is preventing the reduce step from completing.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Could fix it in 1.5.1
> >>
> >> I am starting to think that hadoop compat was so important, it should
> have
> >> been mostly completed before the feature freeze.
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> > -Eric
> >> >
> >>
>

--001a11c37f5a3d493c04dd3e45fd--