Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAPMpPc42-YWTduc4AqZbmDV4yxX-wocGUzpRg5-djVaYjCQ+RA@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CADxc9Bm6pWatvfDDMhFznTpO7SMr1+ApL1bApid-LtNySbJVUA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGUtCHq1YiMtmtsurzSdsCPiKhi=ncAF7WFDKRh8=PnpVN42MA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPMpPc42-YWTduc4AqZbmDV4yxX-wocGUzpRg5-djVaYjCQ+RA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 12:02:33 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <CAL5zq9bVvx=JAnEsByVzpw6sKdEGnxy6Fm439MEt0oF+=z+01g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: hadoop-2.0 incompatibility
From: Christopher <ctubbsii@apache.org>
To: Accumulo Dev List <dev@accumulo.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Sure, that's still an option, but I don't think this particular
incompatibility makes it necessary, does it?

--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii


On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Adam Fuchs <afuchs@apache.org> wrote:
> We still have the option of putting out a separate build for 1.5.0
> compatibility with hadoop 2. Should we vote on that release separately?
> Seems like it should be easy to add more binary packages that correspond to
> the same source release, even after the initial vote.
>
> Adam
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Keith Turner <keith@deenlo.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Eric Newton <eric.newton@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Ugh.  While running the continuous ingest verify, yarn spit this out:
>> >
>> > Error: Found interface org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.Counter, but class was
>> > expected
>> >
>> > This is preventing the reduce step from completing.
>> >
>>
>> Could fix it in 1.5.1
>>
>> I am starting to think that hadoop compat was so important, it should have
>> been mostly completed before the feature freeze.
>>
>>
>> >
>> > -Eric
>> >
>>