accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Adam Fuchs <afu...@apache.org>
Subject Re: hadoop-2.0 incompatibility
Date Tue, 21 May 2013 18:03:46 GMT
Yes, that's correct. It looks like we only need to exercise the two builds
option if we find a need later on.

Adam



On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Christopher <ctubbsii@apache.org> wrote:

> Sure, that's still an option, but I don't think this particular
> incompatibility makes it necessary, does it?
>
> --
> Christopher L Tubbs II
> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>
>
> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Adam Fuchs <afuchs@apache.org> wrote:
> > We still have the option of putting out a separate build for 1.5.0
> > compatibility with hadoop 2. Should we vote on that release separately?
> > Seems like it should be easy to add more binary packages that correspond
> to
> > the same source release, even after the initial vote.
> >
> > Adam
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Keith Turner <keith@deenlo.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Eric Newton <eric.newton@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Ugh.  While running the continuous ingest verify, yarn spit this out:
> >> >
> >> > Error: Found interface org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.Counter, but class
> was
> >> > expected
> >> >
> >> > This is preventing the reduce step from completing.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Could fix it in 1.5.1
> >>
> >> I am starting to think that hadoop compat was so important, it should
> have
> >> been mostly completed before the feature freeze.
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> > -Eric
> >> >
> >>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message