accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Medinets <david.medin...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Can Iterators be made user-specific or shell-session-specific?
Date Thu, 09 May 2013 14:44:44 GMT
There is a setscaniter shell command that I had missed. Thanks, David L!


On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 10:39 AM, David Medinets <david.medinets@gmail.com>wrote:

> Yes. But it seems like anything accessing that table also uses that
> iterator.
>
>
> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 9:49 AM, John Vines <vines@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> You can declare iterators to use at scan time.
>>
>> Sent from my phone, please pardon the typos and brevity.
>> On May 9, 2013 9:48 AM, "David Medinets" <david.medinets@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > I'm asking in case I missed something in the documentation. This issue
>> > hasn't arisen before since I haven't shared tables before. When I
>> attach an
>> > iterator to a table in the shell, it affects everyone (and every
>> process)
>> > that accesses that table. Is there a standard of practice? Do people
>> clone
>> > tables before developing new iterators or before exploring data with
>> > existing iterators?
>> >
>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message