accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org>
Subject Re: dependencies within 1.5
Date Mon, 20 May 2013 17:37:16 GMT
I'm actually in favor of the separate module...

--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii


On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Josh Elser <josh.elser@gmail.com> wrote:
> Back when we first moved it from test to server, it was deemed silly to have
> a single module devoted to a single class.
>
> Corey -- if you have reason/justification to make a module out of it with
> your recent changes, that makes sense to me.
>
>
> On 5/20/13 11:50 AM, Ed Kohlwey wrote:
>>
>> Why isn't this it's own module? Hadoop and other projects have their mini
>> cluster code isolated in a separate artifact.
>>   On May 19, 2013 10:11 PM, "Jim Klucar" <klucar@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> MiniAccumuloCluster moved to the 'server' module, which is fine. However,
>>> I
>>> now have to have a dependency on accumulo-start and accumulo-server to be
>>> able to use the MiniAccumuloCluster.  There isn't really any way of know
>>> that until you fire up a MiniAccumloCluster object and call .start() and
>>> get a ClassNotFoundException on the Main class from accumulo-start.
>>> Seems
>>> like depending on accumulo-server should pull in accumulo-start (creates
>>> circular dependency?) or some other solution should be found.
>>>
>>
>

Mime
View raw message