Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 71F2FFFE3 for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 02:01:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 58059 invoked by uid 500); 4 Apr 2013 02:01:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 58030 invoked by uid 500); 4 Apr 2013 02:01:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 58022 invoked by uid 99); 4 Apr 2013 02:01:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Apr 2013 02:01:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.18.2.206] (HELO exprod7og126.obsmtp.com) (64.18.2.206) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 04 Apr 2013 02:01:32 +0000 Received: from mail-ve0-f200.google.com ([209.85.128.200]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob126.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUVze593pafqGOJlTyuubotxKeWOveXIM@postini.com; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 19:01:12 PDT Received: by mail-ve0-f200.google.com with SMTP id m1so3514935ves.3 for ; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 19:01:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-received:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to :x-mailer:x-gm-message-state; bh=JdSj2lOGovzmvsStVXVAMppUQ/Z9QpR2Zw21hc1DLnE=; b=L1e6PwnWUgjhWkzBKoH7XNsUbw2+wL1i5nZO4TLsK0Pq3jb2cn3OZpneiaSZBI9e/R OdWLqu2coSBtE/JjxglFnk/ZWVAbNKZ8YKb+AtvWMp2m+Q7QoEEE0cfA6ntvXqqm8g7T 3Rqn5yqxHPfeNSdcv1lgtmZBdMJZ+4zvX0YNyX4SO925DXgpAmYhv5sosbnqlQ3xMjoJ IU9sTp61z3e3juYwBG0PxGk7WUIfMyZ+uSNIqdzfz8Ma7C8HHdVJIAKsxbPXh6GGpgQ4 2BkoTVB0uBFBFs6m+MvEECH/bjmWEl4GAUV0o9lWyt1XAFqC0QLkwqoWJBDE9QsuyJf7 m9Sw== X-Received: by 10.224.96.4 with SMTP id f4mr3473146qan.79.1365040871346; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 19:01:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.224.96.4 with SMTP id f4mr3473140qan.79.1365040871251; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 19:01:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tt5746-m.home (pool-173-59-255-179.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net. [173.59.255.179]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ku2sm8701539qeb.4.2013.04.03.19.01.09 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 03 Apr 2013 19:01:10 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283) Subject: Re: Backport of MiniAccumuloCluster v1.5 to v1.4 From: Corey Nolet In-Reply-To: <515CDB9B.1090601@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 22:01:08 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <631698E8-5C6E-4B28-8EB3-5D4B0B0A4FD4@texeltek.com> <515CDB9B.1090601@gmail.com> To: dev@accumulo.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk6fohdR4jFUhqyYEM1PfcxCQj4xqIaRWLAG81rDUORWxbb/6dW6V1OHKLnVVfxR6qspusAwes4DI+Fr1C7Q3CNkXveqY3YzX3HZ4ORSctRfQvNozMCeGQnaHp6ziR7Dx+ft3HM3LioJJFw2+z1wuONu51hKSNwt2lmjEkxgVR0yT+5C+w= X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I cancelled my patch for the Proxy back port until I got the integration = tests up. I have tested most of the features through my Accumulo++ = project and the unit tests all pass (the cool thing is, I was still = using the client generated with thrift 0.9.1 against 1.4 generated with = 0.6.1).=20 Anyways, I can re-submit the patch for now and continue to churn on the = MiniAccumuloCluster back port if time is of the essence. Currently, I'm = finishing up parsing the command line args in the Initialize class so = that the instance, root user, and root password can be passed in = programmatically. After that, I just need to clean it up a bit and I'll = be done. On Apr 3, 2013, at 9:47 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > My only concern would be having to add something in 1.5 (read as: = delay the 1.5.0 release) to support the backport. Otherwise, +1 from me. >=20 > ps. awesome work so far :D >=20 > On 04/03/2013 09:43 PM, Corey Nolet wrote: >> The back porting of the proxy is pretty much complete. I have not = submitted the patch yet because I am not able to run any automated = integration tests without the mini Accumulo cluster. I've gotten pretty = far with backporting the Mini Accumulo Cluster and it would be massively = useful to have the it in v1.4 (if it works out well). Anyone against = submitting a separate patch for this when it's complete? >=20