Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 55B55F4D2 for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 00:48:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 65804 invoked by uid 500); 17 Apr 2013 00:48:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 65753 invoked by uid 500); 17 Apr 2013 00:48:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 65740 invoked by uid 99); 17 Apr 2013 00:48:06 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 00:48:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: error (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.18.2.22] (HELO exprod7og122.obsmtp.com) (64.18.2.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 00:47:57 +0000 Received: from mail-vb0-f72.google.com ([209.85.212.72]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob122.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUW3xE/lLWfETbBvsIJFG3PSzthh3bhiN@postini.com; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 17:47:37 PDT Received: by mail-vb0-f72.google.com with SMTP id 11so1734516vbe.7 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 17:47:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-received:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to :x-mailer:x-gm-message-state; bh=f9xviL23VXiKSHrKHe/UwqR0blyHy+Ij0er7UTgpJBk=; b=l9G8Vef3apLlT0MdmtPCHufzhntm343NILTexBwdKARfiTIhkSfnvFWr6suHYLyiy1 F/RN/QcQgKpnTllfx1LfUT1rOSDVrMZjYSP5bukf/V1zryGl9ZhfS5eUZXVceBaBpXK2 6tP7YyKukRPb1HkcjcZa7ys/p0vW05Yu/HLXBnjmyIY8py+D1l+8OQ4uDYX82INb0TUA N6OUDZpYRhlsU0VakYoEzF4tK981soLwZYm/lpD22xckLZcg5469Eoifxwn3RvQVguoA 62I9woBqaJ0cUuRwxRaHH5BdWEAgwD8xX5MhSYORztFUsuZhkbeuil+KY7jOdOo4feIG qSgA== X-Received: by 10.224.27.198 with SMTP id j6mr5295284qac.2.1366159635427; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 17:47:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.224.27.198 with SMTP id j6mr5295280qac.2.1366159635287; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 17:47:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tt5746-m.home (pool-173-59-255-179.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net. [173.59.255.179]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ed8sm5676406qeb.7.2013.04.16.17.47.14 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 16 Apr 2013 17:47:14 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283) Subject: Re: VFS class reloading? From: Corey Nolet In-Reply-To: <383416768.883187.1366159193417.JavaMail.root@sz0053a.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net> Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 20:47:13 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <1F70EF00-77B7-4421-B59D-1972EB3ECA7B@texeltek.com> References: <383416768.883187.1366159193417.JavaMail.root@sz0053a.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net> To: dev@accumulo.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkLE5a/1MDhasp+rqOL5trj/Ba3ug8QYvdk9wrqpXgJZlfU+43CIVzBvERmCvIOfv5+P+HRL8m8L5+2STv5OvcNqSyPI2dhfhONUS6A24z0c9xXg10eyN4pWZmQxKAbO//81Z76DWfhDlA/11kHlXgn0u8yHR5Dvu8bDi4nPHjBS01jZ6g= X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I've run into version conflicts with Hadoop 0.20.2 CDH3 series and = jackson versions < 1.9 in the past.=20 On Apr 16, 2013, at 8:39 PM, dlmarion@comcast.net wrote: >=20 > Updated my local 1.5 branch and tried to build with "mvn clean package = -P assemble -Dhadoop.version=3D0.20.205.0". I'm running CDH3 Update 3 = locally, so that should work. A bunch of tests failed in core with:=20 >=20 > Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: = org.codehaus.jackson.map.JsonMappingException=20 > at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:202)=20 > at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)=20 > at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:190)=20 > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:306)=20 > at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:301)=20 > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:247)=20 >=20 >=20 > Has anyone else seen this?=20 >=20 > -- Dave=20 >=20 > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Eric Newton" =20 > To: dev@accumulo.apache.org=20 > Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2013 7:52:09 PM=20 > Subject: Re: VFS class reloading?=20 >=20 > We have tests for dynamic loading of classes so I'm pretty sure it = works.=20 >=20 > John, can you repeat the failure?=20 >=20 > -Eric=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 6:50 PM, Dave Marion = wrote:=20 >=20 >> Looking at the code, it should work. Keith and I had several = conversations=20 >> about what the new classloader should do. I believe that he wanted it = to=20 >> behave like the old one and what I see in the code supports that. If = it is=20 >> not working, then I would say create a ticket for it for now. I'll = try to=20 >> replicate it tonight if I have time.=20 >>=20 >> -----Original Message-----=20 >> From: Dave Marion [mailto:dlmarion@comcast.net]=20 >> Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2013 6:41 PM=20 >> To: dev@accumulo.apache.org=20 >> Subject: RE: VFS class reloading?=20 >>=20 >> The implementation changed several times, so the pre-1.5 layout may = not=20 >> work. In 1.5, using the bootstrap script, it should put the accumulo = jars=20 >> into HDFS and dynamic loading from there should occur. I'll try and = test=20 >> tonight if I have time.=20 >>=20 >> -----Original Message-----=20 >> From: John Vines [mailto:vines@apache.org]=20 >> Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2013 6:30 PM=20 >> To: Accumulo Dev List=20 >> Subject: VFS class reloading?=20 >>=20 >> Maybe I missed something with the switch to the VFS classloader, but = does=20 >> dynamic loading out of lib/ext no longer work? I had accumulo 1.5 = running,=20 >> threw an iterator in there, but had to restart tserver to get the new=20= >> iterator picked up. Was that an intentional change?=20 >>=20 >>=20