accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Adam Fuchs <afu...@apache.org>
Subject Re: multi-table isolated batch scanner
Date Mon, 15 Apr 2013 19:10:29 GMT
Thanks Bill,

I care about latency and throughput. First available result ordering is
fine, though.

Does Guava just chain through a collection of iterators, completing one
then moving to the next?

Adam



On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 3:06 PM, William Slacum <
wilhelm.von.cloud@accumulo.net> wrote:

> How are you expecting to get results back? Guava's Iterables could concat a
> bunch of a Scanners together, if you didn't care about the throughput
> aspect of it and simply wanted results from multiple tables.
>
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Adam Fuchs <afuchs@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Is anyone else pining for a multi-table isolated batch scanner, or is it
> > just me? I like the automatic parallelism and balancing of the batch
> > scanner, but I'm looking to maintain server-side state in my iterators
> over
> > long-running scans. I would also like to scan over multiple tables
> > concurrently. Has anyone tried hacking something together with a pool of
> > non-batch scanners?
> >
> > Adam
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message