accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Keith Turner <ke...@deenlo.com>
Subject Re: Releasing 1.5
Date Thu, 25 Apr 2013 19:32:28 GMT
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 2:54 PM, John Vines <vines@apache.org> wrote:

> What about CDH3U5+ and CDH4? They also require some specialized packaging
> as well.
>

Maybe only Apache Hadoop should be supported by Apache Accumulo?   Cloudera
could package a downstream version of Accumulo that works w/ their
downstream version of Hadoop if they wanted.


>
>
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Christopher <ctubbsii@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > So, I have a process in place for releasing the tarballs, rpms, debs,
> > jars, PDFs, etc. using the maven-release-plugin, that signs and seals
> > everything and deploys to the staging repository for voting. I'm still
> > polishing it before I commit it.
> >
> > However, I've not figured out the best way to generate and release the
> > hadoop2 variants. They should be released with a classifier to
> > indicate they are for hadoop2, if they are released, but our build
> > isn't exactly set up to produce two artifacts per module, and neither
> > are our scripts capable of dealing with artifacts with classifiers in
> > them.
> >
> > My opinion is that we should release for Hadoop 1.0, but support
> > building from source against 2.0. Since 2.0 is still beta, this seems
> > acceptable to me, and we can try to do better support for packaging
> > for 2.0 in Accumulo 1.6.0, with tickets such as ACCUMULO-210 and the
> > like.
> >
> > --
> > Christopher L Tubbs II
> > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Keith Turner <keith@deenlo.com> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 2:03 PM, John Vines <vines@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Yes
> > >>
> > >
> > > Ok, I vaguely remember discussion of this on a ticket or in mailing
> list.
> > > Do you know the details?  Is this caused by something hadoop is doing,
> or
> > > is it how we are using Hadoop?  Can we change something in Accumulo to
> > > avoid this?
> > >
> > >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Keith Turner <keith@deenlo.com>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 1:48 PM, John Vines <jvines@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Has anyone put any thought into how we're going to release 1.5,
> > >> > considering
> > >> > > the special cases needed for the various hadoop releases? I'm
not
> > only
> > >> > > talking about distributions, but also the jars released to
> central.
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > Does compiling against Hadoop 1 result in Accumulo class files that
> > will
> > >> > not work w/ Hadoop 2?
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > > --
> > >> > > Cheers
> > >> > > ~John
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message