Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2843DD3E4 for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 14:22:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 69995 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2013 14:21:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 66670 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2013 14:21:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 59620 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2013 14:16:28 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 14:16:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of eric.newton@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.169] (HELO mail-wi0-f169.google.com) (209.85.212.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 14:16:23 +0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f169.google.com with SMTP id l13so1096298wie.0 for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 07:16:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=irsFfvjcsbPNljwH34Pfyn4N3MyR0zsDe1UwmCPu/A4=; b=dfRoHYG3f8DHnOX30trhjPQI/3/+fbMiJwyxsgX4SuB51K0eHB2zD01QpwQuZDgYvZ GlTGeR7VLESORiegBxQGZC9qtNAUQZlNkIR2sbf8dfUrefrmjcLV6NY/mxirMB2UR0bM H3CLqgxYX1qDNYUSVnGoUhiqE/kiAPHl2fSMTNwhLomh5WhB2uMRGdfKzigmfRqQZtBv 24jo8oHhw+IQ27Fyfo6DznKe/wfRgCRXeHX715tLO2HMsPZWQZJN3xKfGoFGPqygaDGP LzIng3JULeg1iHUexoBrtW9PPJoiFGm1138Ddt0XU3nXUu4i788xzpo7OgGCSfgazz2A HclA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.91.211 with SMTP id cg19mr19472169wjb.43.1363011360228; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 07:16:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.97.1 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 07:16:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <513BDE90.5040201@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 10:16:00 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] release 1.4.3? From: Eric Newton To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bf0c6f2f38f4704d7a6cf06 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --047d7bf0c6f2f38f4704d7a6cf06 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I've created a ticket for the 1.4.3 release. I'll create a candidate today. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1168 -Eric On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Jason Trost wrote: > +1 > > --Jason > > sent from my DROID > On Mar 10, 2013 6:48 PM, "William Slacum" > wrote: > > > +1 for a 1.4.3 > > > > On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 6:21 PM, Brian Loss > wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > On Mar 9, 2013, at 8:14 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > > > > > > > Ditto. In favor. I can help with the release process, as well. > > > > > > > > On 03/08/2013 02:50 PM, John Vines wrote: > > > >> Looking over the tickets, I'm strongly in favor of a 1.4.3 release. > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Eric Newton > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> Here you go: > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+ACCUMULO+AND+fixVersion+%3D+%221.4.3%22+ORDER+BY+priority+DESC > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 12:48 PM, John Vines > > wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>>> What's the best way to do a view of the potential changelog? > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Eric Newton < > eric.newton@gmail.com > > > > > > >>>> wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>>> Putting out a release and testing it requires significant effort. > > It > > > >>>> will > > > >>>>> delay the 1.5.0 release unless we can get some additional > resources > > > to > > > >>>>> perform the work in parallel. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> I'm for releasing 1.4.3 because I'm supporting customers using > > 1.4.2 > > > >>>> with > > > >>>>> patches, which is not ideal. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> If you vote +1, consider moving the process ahead by volunteering > > > your > > > >>>> time > > > >>>>> to build and test the release candidates. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> -Eric > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Christopher < > ctubbsii@apache.org> > > > >>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>> It might be useful to just roll out a release candidate (because > > > that > > > >>>>>> could really be done at any time), and vote on that, rather than > > > vote > > > >>>>>> twice, once on the idea of releasing, then again on the release > > > >>>>>> candidate. > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> -- > > > >>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II > > > >>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Christopher < > ctubbsii@apache.org > > > > > > >>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>> +1 for putting together a 1.4.3 release. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> -- > > > >>>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II > > > >>>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Eric Newton < > > > eric.newton@gmail.com > > > >>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>> There has been some offline discussion of releasing 1.4.3. > This > > > >>>>>> discussion > > > >>>>>>>> needs to be held with the full team. > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> Please discuss and vote. > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> -Eric > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > --047d7bf0c6f2f38f4704d7a6cf06--