Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6142AE8D6 for ; Fri, 8 Mar 2013 19:51:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 43911 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2013 19:51:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 43870 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2013 19:51:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 43861 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2013 19:51:39 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 19:51:39 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-lb0-f172.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username vines, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 19:51:38 +0000 Received: by mail-lb0-f172.google.com with SMTP id n8so1624713lbj.3 for ; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 11:51:36 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.152.148.195 with SMTP id tu3mr3076834lab.27.1362772296313; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 11:51:36 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: vines@apache.org Received: by 10.114.28.99 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Mar 2013 11:50:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: John Vines Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 14:50:55 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] release 1.4.3? To: Eric Newton Cc: Accumulo Dev List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f234855a1b2be04d76f2657 --e89a8f234855a1b2be04d76f2657 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Looking over the tickets, I'm strongly in favor of a 1.4.3 release. On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Eric Newton wrote: > Here you go: > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+ACCUMULO+AND+fixVersion+%3D+%221.4.3%22+ORDER+BY+priority+DESC > > > On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 12:48 PM, John Vines wrote: > >> What's the best way to do a view of the potential changelog? >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Eric Newton >> wrote: >> >> > Putting out a release and testing it requires significant effort. It >> will >> > delay the 1.5.0 release unless we can get some additional resources to >> > perform the work in parallel. >> > >> > I'm for releasing 1.4.3 because I'm supporting customers using 1.4.2 >> with >> > patches, which is not ideal. >> > >> > If you vote +1, consider moving the process ahead by volunteering your >> time >> > to build and test the release candidates. >> > >> > -Eric >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Christopher >> wrote: >> > >> > > It might be useful to just roll out a release candidate (because that >> > > could really be done at any time), and vote on that, rather than vote >> > > twice, once on the idea of releasing, then again on the release >> > > candidate. >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Christopher L Tubbs II >> > > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii >> > > >> > > >> > > On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Christopher >> > wrote: >> > > > +1 for putting together a 1.4.3 release. >> > > > >> > > > -- >> > > > Christopher L Tubbs II >> > > > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Eric Newton > > >> > > wrote: >> > > >> There has been some offline discussion of releasing 1.4.3. This >> > > discussion >> > > >> needs to be held with the full team. >> > > >> >> > > >> Please discuss and vote. >> > > >> >> > > >> -Eric >> > > >> > >> > > --e89a8f234855a1b2be04d76f2657--