accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Medinets <>
Subject Re: Using powermock-api-mockito in tests?
Date Fri, 22 Mar 2013 02:08:48 GMT
I hate ignoring things. It makes me uneasy. I'm looking at the other
tests as well. For example, the AccumuloDFSBase class depends on
running /bin/sh to find a umask. No reason that dependency can't be
mocked out during testing... If nothing else, this research will form
my own set of Accumulo Zen Koans.

On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:03 PM,  <> wrote:
> Take a look at my other email on this subject, it might be better to just add the profile
that I mentioned and add this to the list of ignored tests for now. I know that there is a
ticket for removing ACCUMULO_HOME in all places.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Medinets" <>
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 9:58:18 PM
> Subject: Re: Using powermock-api-mockito in tests?
> Dave, you were very close. Here is the mocking code that I used.
> Map<String, String> mockSystemProperties = new HashMap<String, String>();
> mockSystemProperties.put("ACCUMULO_HOME", System.getenv("HOME"));
> PowerMock.mockStaticPartial(System.class, "getenv");
> EasyMock.expect(System.getenv()).andReturn(mockSystemProperties).anyTimes();
> EasyMock.expect(System.getenv("ACCUMULO_XTRAJARS")).andReturn("").anyTimes();
> PowerMock.replayAll();
> I'd like write a JIRA ticket and commit this code. I'll wait until
> tomorrow for feedback though. No rush for this kind of change.
> The message that started this investigation was:
> testDefaultConfig(org.apache.accumulo.start.classloader.vfs.AccumuloVFSClassLoaderTest):
> Could not find file with URI "/lib/ext/[^.].*.jar" because it is a
> relative path, and no base URI was provided.
> It occured on line 135 of because
> ACCUMULO_HOME was blank and therefore no base URI was provided.

View raw message