Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-5308-apmail-accumulo-dev-archive=accumulo.apache.org@accumulo.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 871BCDF19
	for <apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Wed, 27 Feb 2013 03:42:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 664 invoked by uid 500); 27 Feb 2013 03:42:47 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@accumulo.apache.org
Received: (qmail 613 invoked by uid 500); 27 Feb 2013 03:42:47 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@accumulo.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@accumulo.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@accumulo.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.accumulo.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@accumulo.apache.org
Received: (qmail 596 invoked by uid 99); 27 Feb 2013 03:42:46 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 03:42:46 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of david.medinets@gmail.com
 designates 74.125.82.178 as permitted sender)
Received: from [74.125.82.178] (HELO mail-we0-f178.google.com) (74.125.82.178)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 03:42:40 +0000
Received: by mail-we0-f178.google.com with SMTP id x48so78744wey.23
        for <dev@accumulo.apache.org>; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 19:42:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=d4LJS2bisuDymzDYPfiZuXfAPk8QGARkX3YLpOM9teI=;
        b=HwBgJnU9PoDuXEnUIHMNHN/6hCmV5PwQ96rB7CotaWU82LPbFUFdsJQMz66IQVURQk
         sIbehG3TU1K6GZisoqnKKCrQQtjbiS/eN184YxArFUYbI+l6zU9T1xIRJo3A9q18RYil
         yAV2NACw00kpLPTwYTRGqzhQaLRP+wAoIN1DCdYZx42TfDrG6Z4pPxDngAgoJCIkZqRW
         SkYLKd5q+++v+J18t4jdfv708PNS7JV6O1+etQ/LN4fyxKH7/MRKAGQ4Sz4Co57q4NGZ
         wYjcpx+Ib/V5m0xMWPfyj/6XtkdUqxGKgpoHqevxE9eRF9+GlvU627sWwjLL1Ktv8cSJ
         ykvA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.181.12.103 with SMTP id ep7mr23396203wid.12.1361936538812;
 Tue, 26 Feb 2013 19:42:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.194.76.146 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 19:42:18 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 22:42:18 -0500
Message-ID: 
 <CAOiJXP4CKyb+yBFW3bDkVp4MO00g_Kp2Hu1UXNd86MkCA0Knsw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Should Jenkins have a job for the 1.5 branch?
From: David Medinets <david.medinets@gmail.com>
To: accumulo-dev <dev@accumulo.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

https://builds.apache.org/view/A-F/view/Accumulo/ - is this the right
place to look?