Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1E656D586 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 19:04:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 57321 invoked by uid 500); 20 Nov 2012 19:04:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 57215 invoked by uid 500); 20 Nov 2012 19:04:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 57200 invoked by uid 99); 20 Nov 2012 19:04:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 19:04:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ctubbsii@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.41 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.41] (HELO mail-la0-f41.google.com) (209.85.215.41) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 19:04:16 +0000 Received: by mail-la0-f41.google.com with SMTP id m15so3376785lah.0 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 11:03:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=oE/EYVnKtKn1AC0hvJX+BxPg4l12+t2gQJUwGCLHdp8=; b=XGnSSVBr1iUQL5j5wQj0jT6nlwhexLCMB2k318UjjJO9RUNgfpXqOv37pcFsu1JonJ wO8xruDF4IH9t6vvdUFyY7PuCUOWZqsHGCFOwkJ62sdWPq5XfhJqYAqe7So9EBS+69nB Mmvcv/yRoNbiSnSrU9B08ZWesNuUATKGJAtXmFRQMvAwtfoNOsGANQXEkNSnH9mdFDMe PX9jVnVnr3kKFARbPBJz9bI6anmB3yPobLTlMMSVf3JfAOzulDm5XZ8oQJIiQVtbVT13 8GVO/gYYPrKXbjO6A4iXnT0Z7IuQ2VmxLr2b32IB+T3eKBl9WTvFfxZaMAp8WYSv7dAe /tLA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.113.225 with SMTP id jb1mr15358856lab.23.1353438236004; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 11:03:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.64.45 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 11:03:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <50A9736E.3080901@gmail.com> References: <50A9736E.3080901@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 14:03:55 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: If you are wondering why site:site seems to take about a week ... From: Christopher Tubbs To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0408d91b48502d04cef1e58e X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --f46d0408d91b48502d04cef1e58e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Moving to the natural Maven 3 usage of maven-site-plugin as a normal build plugin, with configuration for reporting, instead of dealing with the massive "reporting" section that gets mapped to the maven-site-plugin, may also help. -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > +1 For moving cobertura to its own profile, add something saying so to the > readme/website, and let people decide when they want to activate it. > > > On 11/18/2012 05:56 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > >> There's a very longstanding bug/confusion in Maven that results from >> reporting plugins that fork executions. That's not the same thing as >> forking a jvm, it's an internal maven business where a plugin says, >> 'whoops, to run me you have to make a whole new maven and run all this >> other stuff first'. >> >> The cobertura plugin does this. So does Javadoc in some really irritating >> cases. >> >> If folks would like a faster site build, I'd suggest moving cobertura >> to a profile. >> >> If the current 'go for coffee' situation doesn't bother anyone too >> much, we can leave it alone. >> > --f46d0408d91b48502d04cef1e58e--