Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 011A09568 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 01:59:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 94450 invoked by uid 500); 7 Sep 2012 01:59:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 94422 invoked by uid 500); 7 Sep 2012 01:59:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 94412 invoked by uid 99); 7 Sep 2012 01:59:22 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 01:59:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ctubbsii@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.169] (HELO mail-ie0-f169.google.com) (209.85.223.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 01:59:16 +0000 Received: by iec9 with SMTP id 9so4790042iec.0 for ; Thu, 06 Sep 2012 18:58:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=K0HR6yjyMRc7YfRHzE7utRLQUuWTNgdttMaMneRx9qk=; b=YV97Z75Mw9seJvvQC4MFSsnS4fgV9yWFdXi3VMG3NbrQARqfr2Ui5jPVNBrSRgCk7q LraFPB7iIgJQ81yZrLV7Vx2qxUEoC5oj+XU7SMqAU1xoOQI1YMlNaOtGADC9+pn41hnH 62bZt6e3GYp3Fc1KZMfkAkbiWZQuQxQOHVEdlQSG4QTfiFIluzkTfkUP5mQ7MGSN7jBA UBAguEEGGxxu+LCtnWkbHN6S0c7ezIb9U3V1G+M88WW3i9z9C8O6BAVOdvY7XXhj2O87 PlcKo44VyS3oKsAv20t/JKA+c1FpsUL0DhOpP4Yluqikz+kBa0X77F9GgZshx79Jwvai dNUA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.222.133 with SMTP id qm5mr8435786igc.39.1346983135361; Thu, 06 Sep 2012 18:58:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.52.194 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 18:58:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 21:58:55 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Dev list spam From: Christopher Tubbs To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org A separate list would be great. Replies working that way would be great. The JIRA notifications have the type in the subject line, so that's easy enough to filter, once you've decided to explicitly subscribe to the jira notifications list (versus getting them when you might not have expected to on the dev list). On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Billie Rinaldi wrote: > We're halfway through the process of getting a separate notifications list > set up for JIRA notifications. The reply-to for things sent to this list > will be jira@apache, so if you reply to one of the notifications your reply > will get posted on the ticket as a comment. (This can be simulated now by > replying to a ticket and changing the to address to jira@apache.) The list > has been created, but the step to switch jira emails so they are sent to > that list has not been made. We need to open an INFRA ticket to do that. > I'm not sure how hard it would be to remove some types of notifications, > but this is really only an issue when we are doing cleanups like this one. > > Billie > > > On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Christopher Tubbs wrote: > >> All- >> >> It seems to me that notification emails to the dev list for every >> minor ticket change, even just routine pedantic checks for documenting >> the affected versions and fix versions, tags, or affected components, >> is unnecessary. Is it possible to unlink these from the mailing list? >> Or to make them less spammy? >> >> I think new tickets would be useful to get notifications for, but it >> seems to me that there should be an RSS feed or something similar for >> that (maybe also for these changes). >> >> Another confusing thing is that when these notifications go to the >> mailing list, people can respond there instead of on the ticket, and >> you lose important conversation history (or at least, it's harder to >> piece it together). >> >> These are just my thoughts, but what do you guys think? >> >> -Christopher >> >> P.S. I sincerely apologize for the spam regarding my cleaning up >> tickets today. I thank you for your patience in this regard. >>