Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-4249-apmail-accumulo-dev-archive=accumulo.apache.org@accumulo.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EC8E0DC4E
	for <apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Wed,  8 Aug 2012 18:57:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 68328 invoked by uid 500); 8 Aug 2012 18:57:44 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@accumulo.apache.org
Received: (qmail 68300 invoked by uid 500); 8 Aug 2012 18:57:44 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@accumulo.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@accumulo.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@accumulo.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.accumulo.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@accumulo.apache.org
Received: (qmail 68291 invoked by uid 99); 8 Aug 2012 18:57:44 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Aug 2012 18:57:44 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bimargulies@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.220.169 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.220.169] (HELO mail-vc0-f169.google.com)
 (209.85.220.169)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Aug 2012 18:57:38 +0000
Received: by vcbfl10 with SMTP id fl10so1249971vcb.0
        for <dev@accumulo.apache.org>; Wed, 08 Aug 2012 11:57:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=OMogEKuldC6oOcWkisD9FYtzf+VK2mkVnw9iK5IXX1E=;
        b=vKntIfTQupzkHW5kWeuR160Iy1qjOILcBgUzUpmpJ5v9ojbnZcdW2kuwBEPdPEz8gh
         o1nPbzKibw3PhxFNnnZodvFS6gvuj8rxWE0UC6sSVlqHjMUQa6NLiozDMS6LqQrG7J98
         yxArdT4eTTLfSbEwJFRMHylBcFPqnLmJDZqKjfVhM1JGvQu7pF0IItEqbonN1L+wM6R4
         dMmM/silActdSDnhQPFRgonJZGTeclypSysD42by8daiEZLTKQlo8DGpNVX0s+zD1TJx
         Khi8fimcGbaOuuPjGvcq7gHUkEFFT6AnRZUgwJBIpUJgMuigyxjrtu3bN14B1D17CyNo
         J2fQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.221.10.13 with SMTP id oy13mr2741854vcb.14.1344452237573; Wed,
 08 Aug 2012 11:57:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.58.33.135 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 11:57:17 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 14:57:17 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <CALhtWkeL21cw6_=wAU-FhJO95dc87a1dsXiYkvsQEP13x73Q9A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: River.apache.org
From: Benson Margulies <bimargulies@gmail.com>
To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

Is this stuff remotely relevant to the question of how to manage
iterator code in a safe and organized way?