Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E683D1B6 for ; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 15:03:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42977 invoked by uid 500); 2 Aug 2012 15:03:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 42948 invoked by uid 500); 2 Aug 2012 15:03:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 42940 invoked by uid 99); 2 Aug 2012 15:03:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 15:03:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.41] (HELO mail-vb0-f41.google.com) (209.85.212.41) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 15:03:20 +0000 Received: by vbkv13 with SMTP id v13so9325582vbk.0 for ; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 08:02:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=z9A2eTmOUZVwNaKve57PMdoylGwpfb+AJXMzItjGTdo=; b=FOY3O8WHcZG+4/junxPBRi7pH3ePbq0IT50cuMv/EzaZ1ZbkBIPDLTFEET+dAN3JdW TvHd3Y8KwJtX2Pf4ahMHVHbCbBTtqUYDyx3nALNNarhkihHgusWnhPgfBbIVgSU9AlkP V5Dw/hajydjYI9VgJ3hThP7/Ee1atuj7WvuWVpga0bYHXWJdZ/03dg1K+puduRYLEikW n6Z1nDydFCMt8ReqZ4FWxYaFHbt1gAcdmua94RztDOuntF2h0F5IXBq7/LuIMpBQrvdb C8ZS1pNpFu3HG9aABjjXjxAIXFioGCZasb0zr0Bd4R9Ng1D7BqhV3KaNh/hBOrLXDwEb 26nQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.150.131 with SMTP id y3mr20090598vcv.42.1343919779541; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 08:02:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.85.232 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 08:02:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5019D98A.2050701@gmail.com> References: <5019D98A.2050701@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 11:02:59 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Vote For A) README_UBUNTU B) "Compiling on Ubuntu" In README From: Keith Turner To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkN7VCcKi0UuR8a+Zy4p07N6kJT6f7GmjoCCSNqNZwC+tDNrCqbKncqkc0+INXxiO2yBmWg X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Dave, Would you be opposed to moving the ubunutu document to the docs dir? Once its there we can add a link to it in svn from the Accumulo developer web page. Also I think the "snv co" instructions should reference a released verion of Thrift, not the branch. This can accomplished by referencing a tag or a download of a release source tar ball. So could do the following svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/thrift/tags/thrift-0.8.0/ What do you think? Also, can you include in the instructions what version of Ubuntu the instructions were tested against? e.g. 12.04 x86_64 Do you know if the native Accumulo libraries build successfully when you follow these instructions? The makefile tries to build 32 bit and 64 bit shared libraries, sometimes this fails on a 64 bit redhat system unless 32 bit libraries are installed. Thanks, Keith On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 9:36 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > Neither > > Like Keith said, I'm not a fan of clustering documentation at the top level, > especially linux distribution specific readmes. Accumulo is agnostic of the > target flavor of linux, as such it doesn't make sense to keep such guidance > beside the source code. As Dave said, I also agree that the user/developer > manual doesn't make sense. I like the current top-level README. Succinct > enough to not drive people away, and gives the necessary basic information > to get up and running. > > I think adding Ubuntu specific information to the accumulo.apache.org site > would be a good place to host this kind of information. You could easily add > a section which includes linux distribution specifics/quirks. > > > On 07/27/2012 11:32 AM, Keith Turner wrote: >> >> One concern I have is clutering the top level Accumulo dir. We do not >> have to put the ubunutu information in the README to avoid this. >> Another option is moving the file to the docs dir or some of the >> suggestions that Dave Marion made. >> >> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 7:16 PM, David Medinets >> wrote: >>> >>> I'd like to get a vote by the contributors on which approach to use. >>> I'll start the voting: >>> >>> A) +1 because I don't know how much information might be needed and >>> the information might change for different versions of Accumulo. Also >>> the README might wind up with many OS-specific sections. And, lastly >>> because I've already done it. :)