Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 18A87DD5D for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 12:21:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42055 invoked by uid 500); 29 Aug 2012 12:20:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-dev-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 41507 invoked by uid 500); 29 Aug 2012 12:20:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 34862 invoked by uid 99); 29 Aug 2012 12:17:08 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 12:17:08 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-we0-f169.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username billie, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 12:17:07 +0000 Received: by weys10 with SMTP id s10so314827wey.0 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 05:17:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.80.134 with SMTP id r6mr3409481wix.1.1346242625583; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 05:17:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.32.6 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 05:17:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 05:17:05 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Broken Build .. It worked for me! From: Billie Rinaldi To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d044403a07ab98604c86689e3 --f46d044403a07ab98604c86689e3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Eric Newton wrote: > The auto-build process is over-constrained for resources. We often have > false-positives for build failures. > Should I configure it not to fail the build if it times out? I don't think I can ask it to try again if it times out. Billie > -Eric > > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 10:17 PM, David Medinets > wrote: > > > I saw a message that the build is broken. However, I have been > > compiling and running it all night. Over and over. I don't see what > > the problem can be. > > > --f46d044403a07ab98604c86689e3--