accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Keith Turner <ke...@deenlo.com>
Subject Re: feedback on Typo
Date Mon, 13 Aug 2012 15:02:21 GMT
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Ed Kohlwey <ekohlwey@gmail.com> wrote:
> I really like this. I've thought for some time that something of this sort
> should be part of the Accumulo core API. The inconsistent use use
> CharSequence, String, Text, and byte[] objects to represent the n-tuples
> gets very old very quickly, and distracts programmers in a multitude of
> ways.
>
> The current API should really be refactored to make CharSequence, Text,
> byte[], and ByteBuffer types available for setting the contents of Key and
> Value types just for consistency's sake. It would be nice to have something
> like this added as well.

I made TypoMutation extend Mutation.  I wanted to make TypoKey extend
Key, but could not because the return types conflicted.  This could be
done, but getRow(),etc would need different names.

>
> It would be good to see this package use nio-ish strategies to reduce the
> load on the garbage collector, by using buffer classes instead of arrays.
> But otherwise the design looks solid.

I would definitely like to avoid allocations if possible, I will look
into that.

>
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Keith Turner <keith@deenlo.com> wrote:
>
>> I put together a simple abstraction layer for Accumulo that makes it
>> easier to read and write Java objects to Accumulo key and value
>> fields.  The data written to Accumulo sort correctly
>> lexicographically.
>>
>> I put the code on github and would like some feedback on the design
>> and whether it should be included with Accumulo.
>>
>> https://github.com/keith-turner/typo
>>
>> Its still a little rough and I need to add encoder for all of the
>> primitive types.
>>
>> Keith
>>

Mime
View raw message