accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Patrone, Dennis S." <>
Subject RE:
Date Thu, 09 Aug 2012 14:46:19 GMT
I haven't been closely following the River project in a while, but I actually had the same
thought as Benson.  I'm no security expert so I can't give a good assessment, but I think
the River folks *believe* they have an infrastructure for keeping things secure (or at least
not executing code that you don't trust).  You might want to look at the
package and sub-packages:

I'm not sure how separate the trust-related infrastructure is from the rest of River, but
it might provide a useful model and starting point at least...


-----Original Message-----
From: John Vines [] 
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 9:50 AM
Subject: Re:

I don't think so. I think the relationship is that we both share the problem of how can you
run dynamic code in a safe way. But after a cursory glance, I don't see them providing any
sort of infrastructure to keep things secure.


On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Benson Margulies <>wrote:

> Is this stuff remotely relevant to the question of how to manage 
> iterator code in a safe and organized way?

View raw message