Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-accumulo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-accumulo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2D43D9096 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 19:12:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85640 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2012 19:12:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-accumulo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 85618 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2012 19:12:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact accumulo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: accumulo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list accumulo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 85609 invoked by uid 99); 10 Mar 2012 19:12:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 19:12:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [206.112.75.239] (HELO iron-u-b-out.osis.gov) (206.112.75.239) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 19:12:40 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqAEAKKmW0+sEAbx/2dsb2JhbABCtUSBD4IJAQEBAwESAmoLCwQBBjshARMFHRkih2OhTQqUeIlEhBuDIgSIVIx4iyuEeIMB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,563,1325480400"; d="scan'208";a="8714503" Received: from ghost-a.center.osis.gov (HELO mail-vx0-f175.google.com) ([172.16.6.241]) by iron-u-b-in.osis.gov with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 10 Mar 2012 14:10:50 -0500 Received: by vcbfl13 with SMTP id fl13so2847834vcb.6 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 11:12:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.72.74 with SMTP id b10mr10539380vdv.85.1331406738734; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 11:12:18 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.148.199 with HTTP; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 11:11:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1281321871.198032.1331406374329.JavaMail.root@linzimmb04o.imo.intelink.gov> References: <1281321871.198032.1331406374329.JavaMail.root@linzimmb04o.imo.intelink.gov> From: John Vines Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 14:11:58 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Maven top pom questions To: accumulo-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf307f35deb6bda504bae8493f X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --20cf307f35deb6bda504bae8493f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Are you looking at the 1.4 or trunk pom? I reworked it in the trunk to use the assembly submodule for the tar.gzs. I see what you're talking about after looking at our jar configuration in the top pom. I think that should be moved to the assembly submodule as well. Although, some of the items we have there, we do want to have inherited, so I'm not sure what you think the best approach would be. John On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > There are some things included in the top-level POM that look like > they are not meant to inherit down. > > The includes and excludes on the jar plugin struck my eye this way. > > Past a certain level of complexities, projects often add a > 'distribution' module so that the top-level pom can consist entirely > of configuration inherited down. > --20cf307f35deb6bda504bae8493f--