Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-accumulo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-accumulo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7AE2B95EF for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:58:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 92191 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2012 14:58:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-accumulo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 92164 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2012 14:58:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact accumulo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: accumulo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list accumulo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 92156 invoked by uid 99); 12 Mar 2012 14:58:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:58:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [206.112.75.239] (HELO iron-u-b-out.osis.gov) (206.112.75.239) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:57:54 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArEFAO8NXk+sEAbx/2dsb2JhbABDtUSBD4IJAQEBAwESAmoLCwQBBg0uIQETBR0ZCBqHY55PCp0jiUSEG4MiBJVMiyuEeIJj X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,571,1325480400"; d="scan'208";a="8720097" Received: from ghost-a.center.osis.gov (HELO mail-vx0-f175.google.com) ([172.16.6.241]) by iron-u-b-in.osis.gov with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 12 Mar 2012 10:55:58 -0400 Received: by vcbfl13 with SMTP id fl13so4454259vcb.6 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 07:57:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.65.239 with SMTP id a15mr14991773vdt.51.1331564248164; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 07:57:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.148.199 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 07:57:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.148.199 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 07:57:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <486043119.201957.1331563964546.JavaMail.root@linzimmb04o.imo.intelink.gov> References: <486043119.201957.1331563964546.JavaMail.root@linzimmb04o.imo.intelink.gov> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:57:28 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: A thought on deletes and compactions. From: John Vines To: accumulo-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf307f338001e78304bb0cf608 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --20cf307f338001e78304bb0cf608 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 That's exactly what I was thinking about. Thanks Keith. Sent from my phone, so pardon the typos and brevity. On Mar 12, 2012 2:52 PM, "Keith Turner" wrote: > We do a full major compaction when the user forces a major compaction > or all of the files satisfy the compaction ratio. > > There is ACCUMULO-96 > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 6:33 AM, John Vines wrote: > > When do we do a full major compaction? I was wondering if we should have > > smart forced compassions, if a regular compaction has X delete entries, > > force a full major compaction. > > > > Thoughts and/or am I missing something? > > > > Sent from my phone, so pardon the typos and brevity. > --20cf307f338001e78304bb0cf608--