accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From John W Vines <john.w.vi...@ugov.gov>
Subject Re: Mocking framework
Date Tue, 01 Nov 2011 19:47:07 GMT
+1

----- Original Message -----
| From: "Jesse Yates" <jesse.k.yates@gmail.com>
| To: accumulo-dev@incubator.apache.org
| Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2011 3:38:22 PM
| Subject: Re: Mocking framework
| Agreed that for 1 test, its not really worth it. However, the point
| would
| be to establish these frameworks as really part of how testing is done
| going forward.
| 
| So, yeah, 1.5 seems like the better place to put that part of the
| patch.
| I'll break up ACCUMULO-19 into just the fix for BatchDeleter and then
| add
| tickets for adding mocking and another for testing for the batch
| deleter.
| 
| Sound good?
| 
| -- Jesse
| -------------------
| Jesse Yates
| 240-888-2200
| @jesse_yates
| 
| On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Billie J Rinaldi
| <billie.j.rinaldi@ugov.gov
| > wrote:
| 
| > On Monday, October 31, 2011 11:52:11 PM, "Jesse Yates" <
| > jesse.k.yates@gmail.com> wrote:
| > > Are there any objections to adding EasyMock and PowerMock as the
| > > mocking frameworks?
| >
| > I am reluctant to add new dependencies for a single test, which
| > would be
| > the case in 1.4 at this point. If you (or anyone) would be
| > interested in
| > making substantial improvements to 1.5 by adding new tests and/or
| > improving
| > existing tests using these mocking frameworks, I think that would be
| > very
| > useful and would provide sufficient justification for the new
| > dependencies.
| >  (A 1.4 branch will be created soon, perhaps tomorrow, and the trunk
| >  will
| > become 1.5.)
| >
| > Billie
| >

Mime
View raw message