accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Adam Fuchs <>
Subject Re: git vs. svn
Date Sat, 17 Sep 2011 01:43:05 GMT
With a little more research, it looks like the git mirror gives us the best
of both worlds anyway. Therefore, I declare this question moot.

On Sep 16, 2011 8:49 PM, "Benson Margulies" <> wrote:
> The project must use Apache svn as the definitive repository if you
> want to be at Apache. You get a git mirror, and some day there's a
> plot to allow full git, but some day is not today.
> Github as a primary reference is right out.
> Many of us make good use of git-svn at this point, infrastructure
> provides git repos to clone that are already tuned for that.
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Jesse Yates <>
>> Personally, I like to use git for my development.
>> I know that other projects in apache commit to a main svn, but have a
>> git that people can pull from. See
>> where they mention
>> they have an apache git that mirrors the svn.
>> -Jesse Yates
>> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Adam Fuchs <>
>>> I've heard a lot of people express a preference for git over svn. What
>>> people think about the prospect of using git (presumably on github)
>>> than Apache's svn servers for Accumulo? Would this be compatible with
>>> other Apache infrastructure we would like to use (jira, confluence,
>>> Has any other Apache project gone this route?
>>> Adam

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message