accumulo-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From build...@apache.org
Subject svn commit: r981172 - in /websites/staging/accumulo/trunk/content: ./ release_notes/1.7.1.html
Date Thu, 25 Feb 2016 23:17:44 GMT
Author: buildbot
Date: Thu Feb 25 23:17:43 2016
New Revision: 981172

Log:
Staging update by buildbot for accumulo

Modified:
    websites/staging/accumulo/trunk/content/   (props changed)
    websites/staging/accumulo/trunk/content/release_notes/1.7.1.html

Propchange: websites/staging/accumulo/trunk/content/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--- cms:source-revision (original)
+++ cms:source-revision Thu Feb 25 23:17:43 2016
@@ -1 +1 @@
-1731730
+1732397

Modified: websites/staging/accumulo/trunk/content/release_notes/1.7.1.html
==============================================================================
--- websites/staging/accumulo/trunk/content/release_notes/1.7.1.html (original)
+++ websites/staging/accumulo/trunk/content/release_notes/1.7.1.html Thu Feb 25 23:17:43 2016
@@ -328,6 +328,14 @@ HDFS High-Availability instances, forcin
     <td>No</td>
     <td>Random walk (All.xml) 18-hour run (2 failures, both conflicting operations
on same table in Concurrent test)</td>
   </tr>
+  <tr>
+    <td>CentOS 7.1</td>
+    <td>2.6.3</td>
+    <td>9</td>
+    <td>3.4.6</td>
+    <td>No</td>
+    <td>Random walk (All.xml) 24-hour run, saw [ACCUMULO-3794][ACCUMULO-3794] and [ACCUMULO-4151][ACCUMULO-4151].
 24 hr run of CI w/ and w/o agitation, saw performance issues outlined in comment on [ACCUMULO-4146][ACCUMULO-4146].
 Ran all test on EC2 master was m3.xlarge and workers were 8 d2.xlarge.  Sun JDK 8 was used
for test.</td>
+  </tr>
 </table>
   </div>
 



Mime
View raw message