accumulo-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From els...@apache.org
Subject [6/9] accumulo git commit: ACCUMULO-3508 Remove empty javadoc comment
Date Thu, 31 Dec 2015 01:45:09 GMT
ACCUMULO-3508 Remove empty javadoc comment

Work around the screwed up checkstyle rule re-adding the space.


Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/accumulo/repo
Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/accumulo/commit/7aaecbbb
Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/accumulo/tree/7aaecbbb
Diff: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/accumulo/diff/7aaecbbb

Branch: refs/heads/master
Commit: 7aaecbbb3073b34660d205f096cf1876a9ab5022
Parents: 1338d03
Author: Josh Elser <elserj@apache.org>
Authored: Wed Dec 30 20:00:30 2015 -0500
Committer: Josh Elser <elserj@apache.org>
Committed: Wed Dec 30 20:29:11 2015 -0500

----------------------------------------------------------------------
 .../main/java/org/apache/accumulo/fate/zookeeper/ZooCache.java | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
----------------------------------------------------------------------


http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/accumulo/blob/7aaecbbb/fate/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/fate/zookeeper/ZooCache.java
----------------------------------------------------------------------
diff --git a/fate/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/fate/zookeeper/ZooCache.java b/fate/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/fate/zookeeper/ZooCache.java
index b30bb15..ceb5427 100644
--- a/fate/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/fate/zookeeper/ZooCache.java
+++ b/fate/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/fate/zookeeper/ZooCache.java
@@ -286,10 +286,8 @@ public class ZooCache {
 
         /*
          * The following call to exists() is important, since we are caching that a node
does not exist. Once the node comes into existence, it will be added to
-         * the cache. But this notification of a node coming into existence will only be
given if exists() was previously called.
-         * 
-         * If the call to exists() is bypassed and only getData() is called with a special
case that looks for Code.NONODE in the KeeperException, then
-         * non-existence can not be cached.
+         * the cache. But this notification of a node coming into existence will only be
given if exists() was previously called. If the call to exists() is
+         * bypassed and only getData() is called with a special case that looks for Code.NONODE
in the KeeperException, then non-existence can not be cached.
          */
         cacheWriteLock.lock();
         try {


Mime
View raw message