accumulo-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From els...@apache.org
Subject accumulo git commit: ACCUMULO-4033 Work around a codestyle formatter bug.
Date Sun, 18 Oct 2015 22:30:53 GMT
Repository: accumulo
Updated Branches:
  refs/heads/master 72f3d89d9 -> 6a9e0b50a


ACCUMULO-4033 Work around a codestyle formatter bug.


Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/accumulo/repo
Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/accumulo/commit/6a9e0b50
Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/accumulo/tree/6a9e0b50
Diff: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/accumulo/diff/6a9e0b50

Branch: refs/heads/master
Commit: 6a9e0b50a285c8d619347c34c3f1aad6494f8190
Parents: 72f3d89
Author: Josh Elser <elserj@apache.org>
Authored: Sun Oct 18 18:27:29 2015 -0400
Committer: Josh Elser <elserj@apache.org>
Committed: Sun Oct 18 18:27:53 2015 -0400

----------------------------------------------------------------------
 .../main/java/org/apache/accumulo/fate/zookeeper/ZooCache.java | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
----------------------------------------------------------------------


http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/accumulo/blob/6a9e0b50/fate/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/fate/zookeeper/ZooCache.java
----------------------------------------------------------------------
diff --git a/fate/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/fate/zookeeper/ZooCache.java b/fate/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/fate/zookeeper/ZooCache.java
index 8c9f80d..2526aad 100644
--- a/fate/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/fate/zookeeper/ZooCache.java
+++ b/fate/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/fate/zookeeper/ZooCache.java
@@ -289,10 +289,8 @@ public class ZooCache {
 
         /*
          * The following call to exists() is important, since we are caching that a node
does not exist. Once the node comes into existence, it will be added to
-         * the cache. But this notification of a node coming into existence will only be
given if exists() was previously called.
-         *
-         * If the call to exists() is bypassed and only getData() is called with a special
case that looks for Code.NONODE in the KeeperException, then
-         * non-existence can not be cached.
+         * the cache. But this notification of a node coming into existence will only be
given if exists() was previously called. If the call to exists() is
+         * bypassed and only getData() is called with a special case that looks for Code.NONODE
in the KeeperException, then non-existence can not be cached.
          */
         cacheWriteLock.lock();
         try {


Mime
View raw message