Mailing-List: contact user-help@abdera.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@abdera.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jasnell@gmail.com designates
 74.125.82.42 as permitted sender)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jasnell@gmail.com designates
 10.180.82.132 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.180.82.132;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4F4DD03B.6080201@destin.be>
References: <4F4DD03B.6080201@destin.be>
From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 08:26:07 -0800
Message-ID: 
 <CABP7Rbe9-sG9xGepsCJ84aeKfNk0JD7jD=OXggrN3JkvGk0j4g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Abdera and OData
To: user@abdera.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

To date I do not believe OData support has been looked at in detail
but it certainly would be interesting to explore.

On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Christophe Dupriez
<christophe.dupriez@destin.be> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I find no reference about somebody having evaluated the potential support of
> OData.org by Abdera.
>
> OData brings interesting concepts in term of URIs organization.
> It also organizes the payload of Atom entries (which is probably less useful
> from my point of view)
>
> I began some tests with Abdera 1.1.2 for a LIMITED support of OData
> conventions and I was asking myself:
> 1) Does Abdera 2 will have some advantages for OData?
> 2) Who is also interested by the topic?
> 3) What would the exact goals and non-goals for Abdera support of OData?
> 4) What could be the relation with odata4j.org?
>
> Have a nice day!
>
> Christophe Dupriez