abdera-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chris Berry <chriswbe...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Atom XSD
Date Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:57:53 GMT
I think there are good reasons why a XSD is avoided in favor of  
RelaxNG ;-)

On Jun 18, 2008, at 11:53 AM, Danny Ayers wrote:

> 2008/6/18 Jim Ancona <jim@anconafamily.com>:
>
>> Remy Gendron wrote:
>>
>>> I have found some Atom XSDs… but is there one that is more  
>>> 'official' than
>>> the others?
>>>
>>> Am I right into believing that the Atom spec does not come with a  
>>> XSD?
>>
>>
> You are correct.
>
>
>> RFC 4287 includes an informative Relax NG schema in Appendix B. Yuu  
>> could
>> try using Trang (http://www.thaiopensource.com/relaxng/trang.html) to
>> convert it to XSD.
>>
>> You might have more luck asking on the atom-syntax list. OTOH, I just
>> searched there myself and didn't find much relevant. This post looked
>> interesting, but again the schemas are RNG not XSD:
>> http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/msg19894.html
>
>
> What Jim said (I could never have found such references!)
>
> I'm fairly sure prog APIs exist now in every language under the sun.
> May I ask, what do you want the xsd for?
>
> Cheers,
> Danny.

S'all good  ---   chriswberry at gmail dot com




Mime
View raw message