abdera-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dan Diephouse <dan.diepho...@mulesource.com>
Subject Re: Enterprise messaging with Atom Feeds
Date Wed, 12 Mar 2008 00:16:19 GMT
There's been some good discussion about how to do this type of thing in 
the past. ActiveMQ implements a RESTful interface via per-consumer queues:


There's also a good thread on how to do Queueing scenarios RESTfully here:


A per-consumer subscription is probably the sanest way to do this with 
Atom without introducing application specific semantics.


P.S. I just realized I never replied to your blog comment - I'll do that 

Bruno Luiz Pereira da Silva wrote:
> Hi, I'd like to ask you guys about something I'm considering to use in a
> project.
> We are developing several asynchronous processes here, and we will populate
> a queue with items to be processed. This queue will be consumed by lots
> (let's say 100-200) of simultaneous threads to process the items. Upon
> completion, the processor will publish to another queue, of successfully
> processed items.
> I'm considering the use of Atom feeds for both queues. An item to be
> processed would be published as an entry of the "To be processed" feed. And
> after being successfully processed, the item would be published as an item
> of the "Successfully processed" feed.
> In order to avoid 2 different batch instances processing the same item from
> the "To be processed" feed, I thought of using ETag to manage this. A batch
> instance trying to get an item to process would try to update a given
> element of the entry, informing the ETag of the item. If the batch instance
> is able to update the element, it'll then process the item and then publish
> this entry to the "Successfully processed" feed, if everything goes well
> with the processing.
> I'd like to know if you guys think Atom feeds are adequate to do this, or if
> this is just not a good idea. I don't know if Atom feeds can handle well
> several threads trying to update something at the same time.
> I'll appreciate your thoughts and comments.

Dan Diephouse
http://mulesource.com | http://netzooid.com 

View raw message