Mailing-List: contact dev-help@abdera.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@abdera.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ant.elder@gmail.com designates
 74.125.83.42 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
         :subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=f3g35l0o4hqGHmts415KLQrMIqVC0SOXL6FMn2Slz/V+V0uKMKZKkfzP2V27SZs56e
         T71Ibyb/AFfIEipC9P2OmqWzmUfSA+g80r+1yoFQl18BNAGFSy6Pn63D6r2CNiRDY+Ay
         3Fx5yDN417rTNrH14E019xvYUf2g+PebY8o+c=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: antelder@apache.org
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimjQfY5jEqrHCAgnxtG2Blz8iXX8y8sqmtldXkv@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTinVSDW601BK9aGB5AMNcb4XyfWkKT5RiVJOUEri@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikB952-h-m4IGzIDRW1Ka4X1B53gU0gAay5uNhl@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikBGBpbc_h_mDHfibLjTSgfDctDYNpg6s4EnLap@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimjQfY5jEqrHCAgnxtG2Blz8iXX8y8sqmtldXkv@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 12:08:06 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTinv3nVzWeLuQFPsDBnvN1cL55rRGWKBeS3_wrV2@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Abdera 1.1 RC1
From: ant elder <ant.elder@gmail.com>
To: dev@abdera.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Good comments, lets work on fixing them for the next release.

   ...ant

On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 6:34 PM, ck <ch.ko123@googlemail.com> wrote:
> +1 for the release
>
> Some notes on the release candidate:
> - Maybe the docs folder could need some more love
> - The README doesn't mention the 1.1 version
> - What is the purpose of the abdera-1.1.jar file within the zip-Files?
> It contains not only the Abdera classes, but also some, not all, of
> the dependency jar file as well as example properties etc.
>
> I'm fine with dropping the Java 5 support in the next version, but
> this should happen intentionally not by accident (poms needed to be
> cleaned up, should be mentioned in the release notes etc.).
>
>
>
> 2010/6/25 David Calavera <david.calavera@gmail.com>:
>> +1 for me.
>>
>> Btw, supporting Java 1.5 is fine while we don't need to change/modify ou=
r
>> source code too much. If Sun/Oracle doesn't already maintain Java 1.5 wh=
y we
>> should support it? It's time to move on!! :)
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 8:50 AM, ant elder <ant.elder@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 9:51 AM, ant elder <ant.elder@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > Please review and vote on the Abdera 1.1 release artifacts.
>>> >
>>> > The binary and source distributions are available at:
>>> >
>>> > http://people.apache.org/~antelder/abdera/1.1-RC1/<http://people.apac=
he.org/%7Eantelder/abdera/1.1-RC1/>
>>> >
>>> > The Maven artifacts are at:
>>> >
>>> > http://people.apache.org/~antelder/abdera/1.1-RC1/maven<http://people=
.apache.org/%7Eantelder/abdera/1.1-RC1/maven>
>>> >
>>> > The SVN tag for the release is at:
>>> >
>>> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/abdera/java/tags/abdera-1.1-RC1/
>>> >
>>> > +1 from me.
>>> >
>>> > =A0 ...ant
>>> >
>>>
>>> Ping, any votes or review comments?
>>>
>>> There was an off list question about if this fully supports Java 1.5.
>>> I've tried building it with a 1.5 JDK, there is a compile problem with
>>> one testcase which i've fixed in trunk. That was a problem with the
>>> testcase code itself though and Abdera seems to work fine with 1.5.
>>>
>>> =A0 ...ant
>>>
>>
>