Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-abdera-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 70461 invoked from network); 8 Jun 2009 19:03:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jun 2009 19:03:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 59419 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2009 19:03:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-abdera-dev-archive@abdera.apache.org Received: (qmail 59360 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2009 19:03:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@abdera.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@abdera.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@abdera.apache.org Received: (qmail 59350 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2009 19:03:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-abdera-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 59347 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2009 19:03:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Jun 2009 19:03:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jasnell@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.196 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.221.196] (HELO mail-qy0-f196.google.com) (209.85.221.196) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Jun 2009 19:03:47 +0000 Received: by qyk34 with SMTP id 34so295593qyk.32 for ; Mon, 08 Jun 2009 12:03:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=6GLTwUjavY0xHXQeZCAN8v9GOEKh+zbcPmJxE/AeLWA=; b=FZAllDtc5gKlm8THmSbhmXSoFy8xExgVdgJuG2NsqyibTQ53EOV9grdM+jFgoz2eHa W/ncgyWebQvZZlSEbSpnvJGQl+pEVuxM3Q8z5CoKXwQUViXK4rm84iM7c7An/4EG2qA6 +VDFPGO+QUbX1TCsdYWo4Y560KpN/iW0VpLjc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=t4juSL8WyhKBC5uPuCpXzkD8K8RbDczhx6xFnCoocyW3LuwJaMtc6HqHJ7N/Jj85aI RgjY8zkpTVgsp0lQIykTDZFycMtzwQGPkEY4oNx7IUMN2Qo9AchJGL+dW7TgneK8drCm En5CJhYdjZgpM//LFWy7YP6ToytvWhPdVIIPA= Received: by 10.224.67.142 with SMTP id r14mr7105035qai.287.1244487806399; Mon, 08 Jun 2009 12:03:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.2.102? (c-98-224-93-96.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [98.224.93.96]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 4sm7189qwe.57.2009.06.08.12.03.22 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 08 Jun 2009 12:03:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A2D60AE.9060602@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 12:04:14 -0700 From: James M Snell User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090409) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: abdera-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Abdera 1.0 from branch or trunk? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Ok, so here's the thing, we have an Abdera 1.0 branch that was voted on months ago, and we have a trunk that has a bunch of bug fixes, etc that are valuable. There are additional changes that I'm planning to make to reduce the number of areas where the discover code is being used (where it's not adding any real value currently). I'm wondering if we should hold off on the 1.0 cut for a couple of weeks, make the additional changes and bug fixes to the trunk and redo the vote for 1.0 based on the current trunk. That, I believe, would provide us with a much more solid release. Whatcha think? - James