abdera-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Dan Diephouse (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (ABDERA-115) Distribution repackaging
Date Sat, 19 Apr 2008 02:16:21 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ABDERA-115?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12590668#action_12590668
] 

Dan Diephouse commented on ABDERA-115:
--------------------------------------

I am completely against moving toward a source folder/tree and getting rid of the modules
if thats what you're proposing. Its bad from a separation of concerns point of view and often
results in unwanted coupling. 

> Distribution repackaging
> ------------------------
>
>                 Key: ABDERA-115
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ABDERA-115
>             Project: Abdera
>          Issue Type: Wish
>    Affects Versions: 0.4.0
>            Reporter: Remy Gendron
>            Priority: Minor
>
> To simplify project configuration and help when I will give ownership of my current project
to someone else.
> The distribution packaging should be remodeled so that including abdera.jar and abdera-src.jar
in the build path is the only action required.
> I would also make a distinction in the folders hierarchy between runtime and compile
time external dependencies.
> Abdera could become a single project, which would simplify and encourage involvement
from the community. The build process would be responsible for creating a suite of module
jars as well as one big, friendly abdera.jar that includes everything.
> The Spring framework would be a good example to follow.
> Thanks again for the great work!

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message