abdera-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James M Snell <jasn...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Abdera 0.4.0-incubating Take 3
Date Mon, 24 Mar 2008 01:30:03 GMT
Ditto. I'm sorry to have responded late. I did verify the new build but 
still... I think another round of voting would have been appropriate.

- James

Garrett Rooney wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Dan Diephouse
> <dan.diephouse@mulesource.com> wrote:
>> I've update the release to contain the bug fix from James:
>>  Binary distributions:
>>  http://people.apache.org/~dandiep/abdera-take4/org/apache/abdera/apache-abdera/0.4.0-incubating/apache-abdera-0.4.0-incubating.zip
>>  http://people.apache.org/~dandiep/abdera-take4/org/apache/abdera/apache-abdera/0.4.0-incubating/apache-abdera-0.4.0-incubating.tar.gz
>>  Source distributions:
>>  http://people.apache.org/~dandiep/abdera-take4/org/apache/abdera/apache-abdera/0.4.0-incubating/apache-abdera-0.4.0-incubating-src.zip
>>  http://people.apache.org/~dandiep/abdera-take4/org/apache/abdera/apache-abdera/0.4.0-incubating/apache-abdera-0.4.0-incubating-src.tar.gz
>>  Maven Repository: http://people.apache.org/~dandiep/abdera-take4/
>>  I don't think we need to restart the vote as the only thing that has
>>  changed is the inclusion of a critical bug fix, but if anyone feels that
>>  we do, let me know.
>>  Actually, now that I think about it, its nearly time to pass this off to
>>  the incubator list for the vote completion!
> For what it's worth, I would be 100% against moving forward with this
> change if we weren't going to do another vote on the incubator list
> anyway.  It's vitally important that we only release artifacts that
> people have actually vetted and voted on.  I certainly trust that
> there are no intentional changes other than that fix, but that doesn't
> mean there were no mistakes.  It's certainly happened in the past that
> some unintentional cruft made it into the release zips due to an
> accident.
> It's somewhat less critical now because another vote is going to
> happen anyway, but still, slipping in changes at the last minute
> without voting on them is very uncool.
> -garrett

View raw message