abdera-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James M Snell <jasn...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: JdbcCollectionAdapter class name is ambiguous
Date Tue, 12 Feb 2008 19:31:19 GMT
For now, I'd be much happier to first get a bunch of adapters 
implemented then worry about how to organize 'em ;-)

- James

David Primmer wrote:
> Lets hope there will be lots of adapters and people will have some
> sort of naming system to follow so that their new adapter can fit into
> a product space with other adpaters. I won't be a stickler on the
> package names. But what if we had some other method of applying this
> metadata? I'm thinking more of a directory that would list these
> adapters rather than requiring someone hunt through source code. High
> level categories for what you want to do and then tag the specific
> adapaters with implementation details. We will have several database
> adapters that are all common in that they do some sql at some point.
> But we should also be able to add more metadata. Think about how
> firefox or eclipse plugin sites work.
> davep
> On Feb 12, 2008 10:22 AM, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Let's assume we end up with several db-to-atom adapters based on several
>> mapping layers, say raw jdbc, ibatis, and hibernate.  What should the
>> names of the various adapters be?  At a high enough level, they all do
>> the same thing: adapt data from a database.  In theory, each could exist
>> within a single package, but they certainly need to have
>> implementation-specific class names.
>> - James
>> David Primmer wrote:
>>> I have an objection to this. It focuses too much on implementation details.
>>> I'd prefer to go the other way towards a name that describes what it does,
>>> not how it does it. You're not adapting iBatis, you're adapting data from a
>>> database. There must be another way to say this. The package namespace seems
>>> to make sense but not the class name.
>>> davep
>>> On Feb 12, 2008 5:11 AM, David Calavera <david.calavera@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> I've seen JdbcCollectionAdapter depends on IBatis and I think the name is
>>>> ambiguous when I read "Jdbc" I think on a native jdbc connection to the
>>>> database without orms. I think we should rename this class to
>>>> IBatisCollectionAdapter and move it to some other package like "
>>>> org.apache.abdera.protocol.server.adapters.orm.ibatis".
>>>> Unless you have no problem, I'm going to create the jira issue and submit
>>>> a
>>>> patch.
>>>> Btw, I'm thinking on create an HibernateCollectionAdapter XD.
>>>> Cheers

View raw message