Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-abdera-dev-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 95642 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2006 00:09:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Dec 2006 00:09:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 70349 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2006 00:09:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-abdera-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 70329 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2006 00:09:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact abdera-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: abdera-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list abdera-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 70320 invoked by uid 99); 8 Dec 2006 00:09:41 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Dec 2006 16:09:41 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [66.249.82.224] (HELO wx-out-0506.google.com) (66.249.82.224) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Dec 2006 16:09:30 -0800 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i26so711660wxd for ; Thu, 07 Dec 2006 16:09:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.90.51.17 with SMTP id y17mr3406073agy.1165536546137; Thu, 07 Dec 2006 16:09:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.90.63.17 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Dec 2006 16:09:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <7b774c950612071609o6716f1f1o62ffebfd72d1f79b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 19:09:06 -0500 From: "Dan Diephouse" To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Deploying Incubator Maven Artifacts [was Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1 Release (RC 3)] Cc: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org, "robert burrell donkin" , abdera-dev@incubator.apache.org In-Reply-To: <1AE130D9-C394-4922-9F9A-9339430AE454@gbiv.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <7b774c950612071500j5e95562axf3e68f27bd04afe3@mail.gmail.com> <1AE130D9-C394-4922-9F9A-9339430AE454@gbiv.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I must be missing something. If they aren't voted on, how do you know if they're valid and meet release requirements? On 12/7/06, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > On Dec 7, 2006, at 3:00 PM, Dan Diephouse wrote: > > > On 12/7/06, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > > >> I would say for now we just remove that jar if it's needed. > >> However, how > >> did > >> the servicemix and other projects votes pass if it's a > >> requirement? Is > >> this > >> another "new requirement in the middle of a vote" thing? > >> > >> > > *wonders the same thing* > > > > Additionally, I just realized there are some projects too that have > > been > > publishing Maven builds that haven't been approved. Most recently > > Abdera did > > this [1][2]. They voted for the release of their binaries, but not > > their > > maven artifacts which they created/deployed post vote as I > > understand it > > (sorry to cause trouble Abdera folks, I was the one pushing for > > those builds > > too!). > > FYI, traditionally, all release votes are for the source code package > and > only that package. Once the source code version is set in stone, > binaries > and assorted other release artifacts can be generated by individual > committers without a vote if the group trusts them to do so and they > have a signed key. Some groups might require a vote on binaries as > well, > but the ASF only requires a vote on the source. > > ....Roy > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org > > -- Dan Diephouse Envoi Solutions http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog