Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-abdera-dev-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 86242 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2006 23:41:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Dec 2006 23:41:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 31357 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2006 23:42:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-abdera-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 31305 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2006 23:42:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact abdera-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: abdera-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list abdera-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for abdera-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 27645 invoked by uid 99); 7 Dec 2006 23:39:44 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy) In-Reply-To: <7b774c950612071500j5e95562axf3e68f27bd04afe3@mail.gmail.com> References: <7b774c950612071500j5e95562axf3e68f27bd04afe3@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <1AE130D9-C394-4922-9F9A-9339430AE454@gbiv.com> Cc: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org, "robert burrell donkin" , abdera-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Roy T. Fielding" Subject: Re: Deploying Incubator Maven Artifacts [was Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1 Release (RC 3)] Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 15:39:08 -0800 To: general@incubator.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - scorpio.lunarpages.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - incubator.apache.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - gbiv.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Dec 7, 2006, at 3:00 PM, Dan Diephouse wrote: > On 12/7/06, Daniel Kulp wrote: > >> I would say for now we just remove that jar if it's needed. >> However, how >> did >> the servicemix and other projects votes pass if it's a >> requirement? Is >> this >> another "new requirement in the middle of a vote" thing? >> >> > *wonders the same thing* > > Additionally, I just realized there are some projects too that have > been > publishing Maven builds that haven't been approved. Most recently > Abdera did > this [1][2]. They voted for the release of their binaries, but not > their > maven artifacts which they created/deployed post vote as I > understand it > (sorry to cause trouble Abdera folks, I was the one pushing for > those builds > too!). FYI, traditionally, all release votes are for the source code package and only that package. Once the source code version is set in stone, binaries and assorted other release artifacts can be generated by individual committers without a vote if the group trusts them to do so and they have a signed key. Some groups might require a vote on binaries as well, but the ASF only requires a vote on the source. ....Roy