Mailing-List: contact abdera-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: abdera-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of jasnell@gmail.com designates
 64.233.184.237 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=DoXkkphabEJ6qRJ/+Qwz4x2SFQ4XJyY04jH7J46KAV7VGRmdzW1RNl+S60hadp8tT/QeNRFwjCpAGHjFGOvFAqCT27rdIPsMTc1zqTtKygYLujGybTZEfX2FnQGBLah8pOIcgz0Rf60GiBRR7pWzU5B5cWhAQiXUI/pVGYvi5xk=
Message-ID: <4554D892.7030206@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 11:52:50 -0800
From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061025)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: abdera-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: 0.2.0 Release
References: <4554D6B5.2080101@gmail.com>
 <7edfeeef0611101149n474f32bcra7c74b55899fbceb@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7edfeeef0611101149n474f32bcra7c74b55899fbceb@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I'd be happy doing it soon also.  I just haven't had any opportunity to
make sure all of the documentation, including the website, is up to
date.  Also, it would be helpful if Stephen or the other Maven'ites out
there could make sure the Maven build still works.

- James

Garrett Rooney wrote:
> On 11/10/06, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote:
>> We've improved the client code, decoupled extensions from the parser
>> implementation, reworked the top level API, broadened support for
>> extensions, added test cases, improved javadocs, updated support for the
>> current Atom Publishing Protocol draft, fleshed out a bit more of the
>> server side stuff, added support for IRI's, added experimental bidi
>> support, improved thread safety and fixed some problems that kept Abdera
>> from working well in server environments.
>>
>> I'd say that we're pretty darn well ready for a 0.2.0 release.  If there
>> are no objections, I'll look at creating the 0.2.0 branch next Friday.
> 
> +1, heck, FWIW I'd be +1 to doing it sooner.
> 
> -garrett
>