abdera-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Elias Torres <el...@torrez.us>
Subject Re: cutting the 0.2.0 branch
Date Fri, 17 Nov 2006 17:42:33 GMT
I did some tire kicking and found no major problems.


James M Snell wrote:
> Ok, all of these issues should now be resolved in both the Trunk and the
> 0.2.0-incubating branch.  I also fixed a couple of other bits that were
> annoying -- generating md5 checksums during the build and excluding the
> feedvalidator.org test cases from the src package.
> Oh, and the security examples will only be built if ABDERA_XMLSECURITY
> is set.
> Please kick the tires.
> - James
> Garrett Rooney wrote:
>> On 11/14/06, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Proposed 0.2.0-incubating Distribution Images...
>>> http://people.apache.org/~jmsnell/abdera.0.2.0-incubating.zip
>>> http://people.apache.org/~jmsnell/abdera.0.2.0-incubating.zip.md5
>>> http://people.apache.org/~jmsnell/abdera.0.2.0-incubating.jdk142.zip
>>> http://people.apache.org/~jmsnell/abdera.0.2.0-incubating.jdk142.zip.md5
>>> http://people.apache.org/~jmsnell/abdera.0.2.0-incubating.src.zip
>>> http://people.apache.org/~jmsnell/abdera.0.2.0-incubating.src.zip.md5
>> A few minor points...
>> One thing I noticed was that the lib/legal directory seems a bit odd.
>> First, it's still got a license file for the geronimo servlet jar,
>> despite the fact that we're not shipping that anymore.  Second, there
>> are some jars in the lib dir that don't have corresponding license
>> files in lib/legal.  json-1.0.jar, wstx-asl-2.0.5.jar, and
>> xmlsec-1.3.0.jar, for example.  I believe all of those are under the
>> ASL, but we've got copies of the ASL in there for other jars, so why
>> not those ones?
>> Same for the other zips too.
>> Also, it looks like we've got copies of the .md5 files for the zips
>> inside the source zip.  That seems wrong.
>> Finally, just doing an 'ant -f build/build.xml' results in compile
>> errors because we don't build the security stuff by default but we do
>> try and build an example that uses the security stuff.
>> -garrett

View raw message