abdera-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James M Snell <jasn...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: cutting the 0.2.0 branch
Date Thu, 16 Nov 2006 04:53:42 GMT
Doh! Ok, I'll get these fixed up in the morning.

Good catch on the security example build, I always build with security
enabled so I missed that one completely.

- James

Garrett Rooney wrote:
> On 11/14/06, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Proposed 0.2.0-incubating Distribution Images...
>> http://people.apache.org/~jmsnell/abdera.0.2.0-incubating.zip
>> http://people.apache.org/~jmsnell/abdera.0.2.0-incubating.zip.md5
>> http://people.apache.org/~jmsnell/abdera.0.2.0-incubating.jdk142.zip
>> http://people.apache.org/~jmsnell/abdera.0.2.0-incubating.jdk142.zip.md5
>> http://people.apache.org/~jmsnell/abdera.0.2.0-incubating.src.zip
>> http://people.apache.org/~jmsnell/abdera.0.2.0-incubating.src.zip.md5
> A few minor points...
> One thing I noticed was that the lib/legal directory seems a bit odd.
> First, it's still got a license file for the geronimo servlet jar,
> despite the fact that we're not shipping that anymore.  Second, there
> are some jars in the lib dir that don't have corresponding license
> files in lib/legal.  json-1.0.jar, wstx-asl-2.0.5.jar, and
> xmlsec-1.3.0.jar, for example.  I believe all of those are under the
> ASL, but we've got copies of the ASL in there for other jars, so why
> not those ones?
> Same for the other zips too.
> Also, it looks like we've got copies of the .md5 files for the zips
> inside the source zip.  That seems wrong.
> Finally, just doing an 'ant -f build/build.xml' results in compile
> errors because we don't build the security stuff by default but we do
> try and build an example that uses the security stuff.
> -garrett

View raw message