Mailing-List: contact abdera-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: abdera-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of jasnell@gmail.com designates
 64.233.184.233 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=cv+hbyQe+uVcdqGQQdrRRaZwDQ83NLpZb1meDIMUEvV2q5vrKEVTdjAm8GL0dMlRH4T3amc5ouXIIZN90T0bz9499ublPMUuiANa/OyyDroiDPOWdI6nIGo5E0wm0yxnyRXCBaczTW2uou/MJmwgL5+5qnhTUI2Eu0EpmZQtFTY=
Message-ID: <44B7B84A.6050205@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 08:29:14 -0700
From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060516)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: abdera-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r421809 [1/2] - in /incubator/abdera/java/trunk:
 core/src/main/java/org/apache/abdera/model/
 examples/src/main/java/org/apache/abdera/examples/appclient/
 examples/src/main/java/org/apache/abdera/examples/simple/
 extensions/src/main/ja
References: <7edfeeef0607140518n36e4befdnc367b4918c0cbd88@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7edfeeef0607140518n36e4befdnc367b4918c0cbd88@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

There are a variety of things here.  For instance, FOMElement used to
have an internal _setAttributeValue method before it had a public
setAttributeValue method... I had never before actually managed to get
around to removing it.  Also, FOMEntry and FOMSource used duplicate code
to do things like generate a listing of Categories and Links with
specific attribute values, now there is a FOMHelper that contains that
code.  To help with iterating through link and category elements
incrementally, there are now a couple of special iterators that are
modeled after the kinds of iterators Axiom provides.

- James

Garrett Rooney wrote:
> [snip]
>> A number of other improvements and simplifications have been made to the
>> parser implementation.  More work is likely necessary but this is, at
>> least, a step in the right direction.
> 
> Can you be more specific about what kind of improvements and
> simplficiations?  This is kind of vague.
> 
> -garrett
>